Beware of these deal killers
December 28, 2012 Leave a comment
The typical real estate sales contract includes not just a price and a closing date but also a number of clauses, any of which can trip up the buyer or seller and scuttle the deal.
While contract language may vary from one place to another — not just state to state but also county to county, and sometimes even from one company to another — here’s a quick rundown of some clauses or conditions that are likely to cause the most trouble:
Financing. Perhaps the most common contract condition makes the transaction contingent on the buyer obtaining a mortgage or a written commitment in the amount required to complete the purchase within a certain time frame.
Each part of this clause is important, obviously. But according to real estate professionals, the timing aspect can be the most troublesome. The sooner the buyer can complete this condition, the better. If the deadline passes without a loan approval, the seller has the right to cancel the contract.
“Since financing contingencies can be complex and vary widely, they require strict attention to all timelines involved,” advises Sam DeBord of Coldwell Banker Danforth in Seattle.
But buyers beware of using this clause to get out of the deal. You could find yourself in default if you fail to follow through on what you agreed to.
In Virginia, making a substantive change — seeking a loan that far exceeds the amount specified in the contract, for example, or being unable to find a rate that’s lower than what’s stated in the contract — may put your earnest money deposit in danger. In Minnesota, if your financing falls through after you have satisfied the financing contingency, the seller can keep all the earnest money as damages.
On the other hand, Florida contracts are “very one-sided” in favor of buyers, reports Liane Jamason of Smith & Associates in Tampa. Twice recently, Jamason had to deal with upset sellers who mistakenly thought they were entitled to their buyers’ deposits when their financing fell apart after months of waiting to close.
Closing costs. A poorly worded clause here can cost the buyer or seller a lot of money, depending on how it’s written.
Often, the agent writes in the contract that the seller will pay X amount toward the buyer’s closing costs at settlement, when what the buyer really wants is that X amount be paid toward closing costs, points, prepaid items, lender-allowed costs, warranties, administrative costs and fees.
“Closing costs are really only those associated with closing the transaction and may be far less than the entire list of financing charges,” explains Jim Mellen of Re/Max Peninsula in Williamsburg, Va. “A buyer who shows up at the table planning to have $6,000 paid on his behalf will be awfully angry if he gets only $1,200 of his fees paid.”
Another possible issue is how the closing cost contribution is stipulated. If it is given as a portion of the selling price, say $300,000, a 3 percent contribution could cost the seller $9,000. But if it is written as a part of the financed amount, say $240,000, the seller would be on the hook for just $7,200.
Make a mistake, and there are no do-overs. “The written word on a contract will trump intentions all day long,” Mellen says.
Disclosures. The different property disclosure clauses are “some of the more difficult to navigate,” says Ralph Harbison of Re/Max Realty Brokers in Birmingham, Ala. Buyers tend to want “yes” or “no” disclosures, but sellers prefer something that says they are not aware of any issues. And that leaves buyers to wonder what’s wrong with the place.
Writing certain inspection clauses — termite, radon, mold, lead-based paint, home — into the contract should go a long way toward removing the buyer’s anxiety, but only if the buyer adheres to the contract’s timelines.
In Florida, for example, the buyer typically has 10 days in which to obtain and review a home inspection. The buyer can cancel the contract during this period by providing a written notice to the seller, or he can ask for an extension. But issues arise when the buyer tries to negotiate repair credits or actual repairs and the inspection period expires.
“If the repair issues cannot be resolved during the initial inspection period, the buyer must execute the cancellation or extension,” says Blair Damson of Coldwell Banker in Coral Springs, Fla.
In the Philadelphia area, as long as the buyer adheres to the time limit, he only has to notify the seller that he does not wish to proceed to get back his earnest money deposit. But Linda Williams, an attorney/agent with Sage Realty in Wayne, Pa., goes a step further by making sure the deposit is not payable to the seller until after the inspection period ends.
In Warren County, N.Y., broker Mark Bergman, president-elect of the local multiple listing service, writes inspection clauses with specific repair cost limitation “to prevent frivolous renegotiation.”
Dates. One more thing about timelines: Be explicit. Contract language should be spelled out in either calendar days or banking days, says Magda Robles of Keller Williams Properties in Weston, Fla. “Number of days is not good enough,” she says. “Specify the specific month, day and year.
“As is.” This clause can be a double-edged sword, says David Welch, a broker in Orlando, Fla. While the seller is not obligated to make any repairs found necessary during an independent home inspection under the as-is clause, the buyer can cancel for any reason if he does not like what the exam has revealed.
Short sales. Buyers need to be leery when a “seller” in a short sale commits to paying closing costs. The bank is the seller, not the occupant, warns Christy Walker of Re/Max Signature in Phoenix. As such, the bank has every right to renegotiate the fees or refuse to pay them at all.
Geneva Mayor Kevin Burns took some heat in February when it was revealed that he had used his city email account to reply to messages about his campaign for the Republican nomination for Kane County Board chairman. The city council declined to pursue disciplinary action against Burns. The emails contained frank exchanges about Burns’ opinions of his opponent and of others, including Congressman Randy Hultgren, who endorsed Chris Lauzen after Burns announced he had Hultgren’s support.
When it came to county politics, Kane County voters elected a new county board chairman, auditor, coroner, circuit clerk and eight new county board members in November. The turnover ushered in a new administration headed by Illinois State Sen. Chris Lauzen. Lauzen pledged a flat tax levy and an end to even the perception of pay-to-play and political cronyism in the county.
After more than a year of debate, the Kane County Board approved revisions to the ethics policy that governs their behavior. But two Kane County State’s Attorneys have ruled large portions of the code unenforceable, possibly inviting a lawsuit.
In McHenry County, voters overwhelmingly defeated in November a ballot measure — championed by state Rep. Jack Franks, a Marengo Democrat — that sought to create an executive form of county government.
Under the executive form of government, the county executive runs the day-to-day operations of the county including the hiring and firing of employees and will also have the power to veto county board decisions.
The county executive, supporters said, would add transparency and accountability to county government, and allow for a stronger county board that would be focused solely on legislative matters
But opponents of the change said the county executive form of government would give the county executive too much power.
Cities, townships and counties across the country had questions on their respective ballots asking voters whether they thought the United States constitution should be amended to keep big money out of politics. A group of Kane County residents, loosely connected to the national Move to Amend group, turned in 14,386 signatures, far surpassing the 12,000 necessary to put a question on the county’s ballot. The group may have turned in more signatures than for any other ballot initiative in Kane County history, according to Chief Deputy Clerk Stan Bond.